iorewdisco.blogg.se - Sap ecc vs hana

#SAP ECC VS HANA HOW TO#
#SAP ECC VS HANA UPGRADE#
#SAP ECC VS HANA SOFTWARE#

HANA does not simplify the data model from ECC. There is zero basis for SAP to call all databases that are not HANA legacy. Is Hasso Plattner Correct on Database Aggregates? The fewer tables in HANA are more complicated than the larger number of tables pre-HANA.Īggregates should be removed and replaced with real time recalculation.Īggregates are very valuable, and all RDBMS have them (including HANA) and they should not be removed or minimized in importance.

Reducing the number of tables does not necessarily decrease the complexity of a database. Reducing the number of tables reduces database complexity. Why Pressure SAP to Port S/4HANA to AnyDB? HANA has many row-oriented tables, as much as 1/3 of the database. HANA does not run entirely with columnar tables. S/4HANA does not eliminate reconciliation or reduce the time to perform reconciliation to any significant degree.ĭoes HANA Have a Simplified Data Model and Faster Reconciliation?

#SAP ECC VS HANA HOW TO#

How to Understand the Mismatch Between HANA and S/4HANA and ECC. Our research shows that not only can competing databases do more than HANA, but they are also a better fit for ERP systems.

Getting ECC on HANA is not a stepping stone to anything.

Customers that place ECC on HANA will see more expense.

And AnyDB already has in-memory/multimodel in the more recent versions of their databases. ECC cannot leverage the analytics benefits of HANA because ECC has minimal reporting.

Customers that move ECC to HANA will see no performance improvement over whatever database they replace.

The sales teams I helped said all kinds of things that look increasingly inaccurate in retrospect. I recall all of this because I supported SAP sales initiatives back in the heyday of the HANA zeitgeist.

And why SAP stopped reporting HANA customer numbers back in 2015 as we covered in the article Why Did SAP Stop Reporting HANA Numbers After 2015. But now it is quite clearly not unavoidable. All of these leveraged the idea that HANA was inevitable. There were so many things like this that SAP and consulting firms proposed, like running a HANA sidecar, etc. The original argument was that it would prepare a company to move to S/4, but it was just a way to sell HANA licenses. Moving ECC onto HANA, or as you say, SOH never made any sense.

#SAP ECC VS HANA UPGRADE#

They should continue to run their stable ECC on AnyDB and upgrade to the latest versions to be able to use new features such as In-memory computing without having to make changes to their ABAP codings, while waiting for the dust to settle on all the reorganization going on.” Our Answer “You left out “Advice for ECC customers” contemplating moving to SOH. Unlike nearly every other article you will find from Google on this topic, it has had no input from any company's marketing or sales department.

#SAP ECC VS HANA SOFTWARE#

Second, no one paid for this article to be written, and it is not pretending to inform you while being rigged to sell you software or consulting services.

First, it is published by a research entity.

Each one of these entities tries to hide its financial bias from readers. Lack of Financial Bias Notice:The vast majority of content available on the Internet about SAP is marketing fiddle-faddle published by SAP, SAP partners, or media entities paid by SAP to run their marketing on the media website.

If you want to see our references for this article and other related Brightwork articles, see this link. We received the following question in our article on SAP Layoffs and a Warning on HANA? Our References for This Article

We evaluate the logic of this proposal.

SAP proposed that ECC customers should move to HANA to prepare for S/4HANA.

Last Updated on Maby Shaun Snapp Executive Summary